This change contains the results of running
./tools/contib/cargo_refactor.py
This will break the next uprev, and needs to be synchronizized
with the corresponding ebuild changes in https://crrev.com/c/3248925
BUG=b:195126527
TEST=./tools/run_tests
Change-Id: Ied15a1841887bb8f59fba65b912b81acf69beb73
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/platform/crosvm/+/3248129
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Dennis Kempin <denniskempin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Verkamp <dverkamp@chromium.org>
Separated out of CL:1513058 to make it possible to land parts
individually while the affected crate has no other significant CLs
pending. This avoids repeatedly introducing non-textual conflicts with
new code that adds `use` statements.
TEST=cargo check
TEST=cargo check --all-features
TEST=cargo check --target aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
Change-Id: Ief399ac868710c3a2d864f98c0ad9215e8917ed6
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1520067
Commit-Ready: David Tolnay <dtolnay@chromium.org>
Tested-by: David Tolnay <dtolnay@chromium.org>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Tolnay <dtolnay@chromium.org>
Split sub-crates under crosvm root directory into several independent
workspaces for adding ebuild files for those crates.
data_model and sys_util could only be built by emerge after creating
their ebuilds.
BUG=chromium:916921
TEST='emerge-eve crosvm'
TEST=Run 'cargo build' under crosvm directory
Change-Id: I2dddbbb7c7344e643183a5885e867f134b299591
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1385972
Commit-Ready: Chih-Yang Hsia <paulhsia@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Chih-Yang Hsia <paulhsia@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Chirantan Ekbote <chirantan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Zach Reizner <zachr@chromium.org>
This CL adds a crate `sync` containing a type sync::Mutex which wraps
the standard library Mutex and mirrors the same methods, except that
they panic where the standard library would return a PoisonError. This
API codifies our error handling strategy around poisoned mutexes in
crosvm.
- Crosvm releases are built with panic=abort so poisoning never occurs.
A panic while a mutex is held (or ever) takes down the entire process.
Thus we would like for code not to have to consider the possibility of
poison.
- We could ask developers to always write `.lock().unwrap()` on a
standard library mutex. However, we would like to stigmatize the use
of unwrap. It is confusing to permit unwrap but only on mutex lock
results. During code review it may not always be obvious whether a
particular unwrap is unwrapping a mutex lock result or a different
error that should be handled in a more principled way.
Developers should feel free to use sync::Mutex anywhere in crosvm that
they would otherwise be using std::sync::Mutex.
TEST=boot linux
Change-Id: I9727b6f8fee439edb4a8d52cf19d59acf04d990f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1359923
Commit-Ready: David Tolnay <dtolnay@chromium.org>
Tested-by: David Tolnay <dtolnay@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Zach Reizner <zachr@chromium.org>
