mirror of
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo.git
synced 2024-11-24 06:19:51 +00:00
docs(e2e): Update e2e test instructions for changed file patterns
chore: let fnetx review e2e tests
This commit is contained in:
parent
72749bcf70
commit
88f653b583
2 changed files with 55 additions and 5 deletions
|
@ -16,6 +16,9 @@ templates/.* @caesar @crystal @gusted
|
|||
## the issue sidebar was touched by fnetx
|
||||
templates/repo/issue/view_content/sidebar.* @fnetx
|
||||
|
||||
# Playwright tests
|
||||
tests/e2e/.* @fnetx
|
||||
|
||||
# Files related to Go development.
|
||||
|
||||
# The modules usually don't require much knowledge about Forgejo and could
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -110,9 +110,13 @@ If you have a [forgejo runner](https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner/),
|
|||
you can use it to run the test jobs:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
forgejo-runner exec -W .forgejo/workflows/e2e.yml --event=pull_request
|
||||
forgejo-runner exec -W .forgejo/workflows/testing.yml -j test-e2e
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Note that the CI workflow has some logic to run tests based on changed files only.
|
||||
This might conflict with your local setup and not run all the desired tests
|
||||
because it might only look at file changes in your latest commit.
|
||||
|
||||
### Run e2e tests with another database
|
||||
|
||||
This approach is not currently used,
|
||||
|
@ -212,9 +216,52 @@ Take a look at `shared/forms.js` and some other places for inspiration.
|
|||
|
||||
### List related files coverage
|
||||
|
||||
If you think your playwright tests covers an important aspect of some template, CSS or backend files,
|
||||
consider adding the paths to `.forgejo/workflows/e2e.yml` in the path filter.
|
||||
To speed up the CI pipelines and avoid running expensive tests too often,
|
||||
only a selection of tests is run by default,
|
||||
based on the changed files.
|
||||
|
||||
It ensures that future modifications to this file will be tested as well.
|
||||
At the top of each playwright test file,
|
||||
list the files or file patterns that are covered by your test.
|
||||
Often, these are files that you modified for your feature or bugfix,
|
||||
or that you looked at (and might still have open in your IDE),
|
||||
because your fix depends on their behaviour.
|
||||
|
||||
Currently, we do not run the e2e tests on all changes.
|
||||
#### Which files to watch?
|
||||
|
||||
The set of files your test "watches" depends on the kind of test you write.
|
||||
If you only test for the presence of an element and do no accessibility or placement checks,
|
||||
you won't detect broken visual appearance and there is little reason to watch CSS files.
|
||||
|
||||
However, if your test also checks that an element is correctly positioned
|
||||
(e.g. that it does not overflow the page),
|
||||
or has accessibiltiy properties (includes colour contrast),
|
||||
also list stylesheets that define the behaviour your test depends on.
|
||||
|
||||
Watching the place that generate the selectors you use
|
||||
(typically templates, but can also be JavaScript)
|
||||
is a must, to ensure that someone modifying the markup notices that your selectors fail
|
||||
(e.g. because an id or class was renamed).
|
||||
|
||||
If you are unsure about the exact set of files,
|
||||
feel free to ask other contributors.
|
||||
|
||||
#### How to specify the patterns?
|
||||
|
||||
You put filenames and patterns as blocks between two `// @watch` comments.
|
||||
An example that watches changes on (in order)
|
||||
a single file,
|
||||
a full recursive subfolder,
|
||||
two files with a shorthand pattern,
|
||||
and a set of files with a certain ending:
|
||||
|
||||
~~~
|
||||
// @watch start
|
||||
// templates/webhook/shared-settings.tmpl
|
||||
// templates/repo/settings/**
|
||||
// web_src/css/{form,repo}.css
|
||||
// web_src/css/modules/*.css
|
||||
// @watch end
|
||||
~~~
|
||||
|
||||
The patterns are evaluated on a "first-match" basis.
|
||||
Under the hood, [gobwas/glob](https://github.com/gobwas/glob) is used.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue