docs: make "features" in readme a heading with sub-headings instead of bullets

The list of features outgrew the bullet form a long time ago...
This commit is contained in:
Martin von Zweigbergk 2022-01-28 22:36:56 -08:00
parent 35e0b855a9
commit 377741c5c6

106
README.md
View file

@ -27,75 +27,73 @@ The command-line tool is called `jj` for now because it's easy to type and easy
to replace (rare in English). The project is called "Jujutsu" because it matches
"jj".
Features:
## Features
* **Compatible with Git**
### Compatible with Git
Jujutsu has two backends. One of them is a Git backend (the other is a
native one). This lets you use Jujutsu as an alternative interface to Git.
The commits you create will look like regular Git commits. You can always
switch back to Git.
<a href="https://asciinema.org/a/DRCzktCyEAxH6j788ZDT6aSjS" target="_blank">
<img src="https://asciinema.org/a/DRCzktCyEAxH6j788ZDT6aSjS.svg" />
</a>
Jujutsu has two backends. One of them is a Git backend (the other is a native
one). This lets you use Jujutsu as an alternative interface to Git. The commits
you create will look like regular Git commits. You can always switch back to
Git.
* **The working copy is automatically committed**
<a href="https://asciinema.org/a/DRCzktCyEAxH6j788ZDT6aSjS" target="_blank">
<img src="https://asciinema.org/a/DRCzktCyEAxH6j788ZDT6aSjS.svg" />
</a>
Most Jujutsu commands automatically commit the working copy. This leads to a
simpler and more powerful interface, since all commands work the same way on
the working copy or any other commit. It also means that you can always check
out a different commit without first explicitly committing the working copy
changes (you can even check out a different commit while resolving merge
conflicts).
### The working copy is automatically committed
<a href="https://asciinema.org/a/zWMv4ffmoXykBtrxvDY6ohEaZ" target="_blank">
<img src="https://asciinema.org/a/zWMv4ffmoXykBtrxvDY6ohEaZ.svg" />
</a>
Most Jujutsu commands automatically commit the working copy. This leads to a
simpler and more powerful interface, since all commands work the same way on the
working copy or any other commit. It also means that you can always check out a
different commit without first explicitly committing the working copy changes
(you can even check out a different commit while resolving merge conflicts).
* **Operations update the repo first, then possibly the working copy**
<a href="https://asciinema.org/a/zWMv4ffmoXykBtrxvDY6ohEaZ" target="_blank">
<img src="https://asciinema.org/a/zWMv4ffmoXykBtrxvDY6ohEaZ.svg" />
</a>
The working copy is only updated at the end of an operation, after all other
changes have already been recorded. This means that you can run any command
(such as `jj rebase`) even if the working copy is dirty.
### Operations update the repo first, then possibly the working copy
* **Entire repo is under version control**
The working copy is only updated at the end of an operation, after all other
changes have already been recorded. This means that you can run any command
(such as `jj rebase`) even if the working copy is dirty.
All operations you perform in the repo are recorded, along with a snapshot of
the repo state after the operation. This means that you can easily revert to
an earlier repo state, or to simply undo a particular operation (which does
not necessarily have to be the most recent operation).
### Entire repo is under version control
<a href="https://asciinema.org/a/OFOTcm2XlZ09LLEI5bHYM8Alw" target="_blank">
<img src="https://asciinema.org/a/OFOTcm2XlZ09LLEI5bHYM8Alw.svg" />
</a>
All operations you perform in the repo are recorded, along with a snapshot of
the repo state after the operation. This means that you can easily revert to an
earlier repo state, or to simply undo a particular operation (which does not
necessarily have to be the most recent operation).
* **Conflicts can be recorded in commits**
<a href="https://asciinema.org/a/OFOTcm2XlZ09LLEI5bHYM8Alw" target="_blank">
<img src="https://asciinema.org/a/OFOTcm2XlZ09LLEI5bHYM8Alw.svg" />
</a>
If an operation results in conflicts, information about those conflicts will
be recorded in the commit(s). The operation will succeed. You can then
resolve the conflicts later. One consequence of this design is that there's
no need to continue interrupted operations. Instead, you get a single
workflow for resolving conflicts, regardless of which command caused them.
This design also lets Jujutsu rebase merge commits correctly (unlike both Git
and Mercurial).
### Conflicts can be recorded in commits
Basic conflict resolution:
<a href="https://asciinema.org/a/MWQz2nAprRXevQEYtaHScN2tJ" target="_blank">
<img src="https://asciinema.org/a/MWQz2nAprRXevQEYtaHScN2tJ.svg" />
</a>
Juggling conflicts:
<a href="https://asciinema.org/a/HqYA9SL2tzarPAErpYs684GGR" target="_blank">
<img src="https://asciinema.org/a/HqYA9SL2tzarPAErpYs684GGR.svg" />
</a>
If an operation results in conflicts, information about those conflicts will be
recorded in the commit(s). The operation will succeed. You can then resolve the
conflicts later. One consequence of this design is that there's no need to
continue interrupted operations. Instead, you get a single workflow for
resolving conflicts, regardless of which command caused them. This design also
lets Jujutsu rebase merge commits correctly (unlike both Git and Mercurial).
* **Automatic rebase**
Basic conflict resolution:
<a href="https://asciinema.org/a/MWQz2nAprRXevQEYtaHScN2tJ" target="_blank">
<img src="https://asciinema.org/a/MWQz2nAprRXevQEYtaHScN2tJ.svg" />
</a>
Whenever you modify a commit, any descendants of the old commit will be
rebased onto the new commit. Thanks to the conflict design described above,
that can be done even if there are conflicts. Branches pointing to rebased
commits will be updated. So will the working copy if it points to a rebased
commit.
Juggling conflicts:
<a href="https://asciinema.org/a/HqYA9SL2tzarPAErpYs684GGR" target="_blank">
<img src="https://asciinema.org/a/HqYA9SL2tzarPAErpYs684GGR.svg" />
</a>
### Automatic rebase
Whenever you modify a commit, any descendants of the old commit will be rebased
onto the new commit. Thanks to the conflict design described above, that can be
done even if there are conflicts. Branches pointing to rebased commits will be
updated. So will the working copy if it points to a rebased commit.
## Status ##