I'm about to add the argument to `jj merge` and `jj close` as
well. For those, I think `--description` would have made more sense
than `--text`, but I don't like the idea of having the short form be
`-d` (sounds too much like `--destination` or `--delete`). It's
unfortunate that `jj describe` set the "commit description" but the
argument is called "message". That still seems better than calling the
command `jj message`.
I've been confused twice that rebasing an open commit so it results in
conflicts doesn't show the conflicts in the log output. That's because
we create a successor instead if a commit with conflicts is open. I
guess I thought it would be expected that a child commit was not
created. Since it seems surprising in practice, let's change it and
we'll see if the new behavior is more or less surprising.
The most annoying remaining bug is that 3-way merge frequently panics
with "unhandled merge case". This commit fixes that by rewriting the
merge code. The new code is based on the algorithm used in Mercurial
(which was in turn copied from Bazaar):
1. Find "sync" regions, which are regions that are the unchanged in
the base and two sides. Note their start end end positions in each
version.
2. Produce the output by taking the sync regions and inserting the
result of merging the regions between the sync regions. These
regions can either be changed on only one side, in which case we
use that version, or it can be changed on both sides, in which
case we indicate a conflict in the output.
It's both more correct and much easier to follow.
We want to be able to be able to do fast `.contains()` checks on the
result, so `Iterator` was a bad type. We probably should hide the
exact type (currently `HashSet` for both readonly and mutable views),
but we can do that later. I actually thought I'd want to use
`.contains()` for indiciting public-phase commits in the log output,
but of course want to also indicate ancestors as public. This still
seem like a step (mostly) in the right direction.
Mercurial's "phase" concept is important for evolution, and it's also
useful for filtering out uninteresting commits from log
output. Commits are typically marked "public" when they are pushed to
a remote. The CLI prevents public commits from being rewritten. Public
commits cannot be obsolete (even if they have a successor, they won't
be considered obsolete like non-public commits would).
This commits just makes space for tracking the public heads in the
View.
All commits in the view are supposed to be reachable from its
heads. If a head is removed and there are git refs pointing to
ancestors of it (or to the removed head itself), we should make that
ancestor a head.
The only invariant we currently enforce is that the set of heads does
not include any ancestors of other commits in the set. I'm about to
make sure that we don't end up with dangling git refs (pointing to
commits no reachable from the heads). It will be useful to have a
single place to enforce that since we'll need to do the same thing
after updating the view as after merging views.
I think it's better to let the caller decide if the parents should be
added. One use case for removing a head is when fetching from a Git
remote where a branch has been rewritten. In that case, it's probably
the best user experience to remove the old head. With the current
semantics of `View::remove_head()`, we would need to walk up the graph
to find a commit that's an ancestor and for each commit we remove as
head, its parents get temporarily added as heads. It's much easier for
callers that want to add the parents as heads to do that.
They're rendered as a single string created by joining the refs by
spaces because we don't have any support in the template language for
rendering a list.
Git refs are important at least for understanding where the remote
branches are. This commit adds support for tracking them in the view
and makes `git::import_refs()` update them.
When merging views (either because of concurrent operations or when
undoing an earlier operation), there can be conflicts between git ref
changes. I ignored that for now and let the later operation win. That
will probably be good enough for a while. It's not hard to detect the
conflicts, but I haven't yet decided how to handle them. I'm leaning
towards representing the conflicting refs in the view just like how we
represent conflicting files in the tree.
This is partly to prepare for merging the operations in order of
transaction-commit time (currently merged in order of operation id),
so we can get a predictable order in tests (assuming transactions are
not committed the same millisecond).
It was really annoying that the order kept changing as commits got
rewritten. Also, I prefer to see the latest commits at the top (like
Mercurial does it).
The function used to be larger when we had more reference cycles
between e.g. the `WorkingCopy` and `Repo`. Now there's only
`Evolution` left, so let's inline the function.
This commits makes it so that running commands outside a repo results
in an error message instead of a panic.
We still don't look for a `.jj/` directory in ancestors of the current
directory.
I often (try to) use the command for throwing away all working copy
changes. That currently results in a crash on
`submatches.values_of("paths").unwrap()`. Let's make it revert
everything by default instead, since that seems to be my
intuition. Unlike most VCS's, we have a backup of the working copy and
the user can simply do `jj op undo` if they realized it was a mistake.
I recently renamed the crate from `jj` to `jujube` because `jj` was
taken on crates.io. I didn't realize that that would change the name
of the binary.
I'm preparing to publish an early version before someone takes the
name(s) on crates.io. "jj" has been taken by a seemingly useless
project, but "jujube" and "jujube-lib" are still available, so let's
use those.
The `evolve` command had TODOs about making it update the checkout and
the working copy after evolving commits. I've been running into that
(being left on an obsolete commit) quite often while dogfooding, so
let's fix it.
Until recently, we didn't have support for `.gitignore` files. That
meant that editors (like Emacs) that leave backup files around were
annoying to use, because you'd have to manually remove the backup file
afterwards. For that reason, I had hard-coded the editor to be
`pico`. Now we have support for `.gitignore` files, so we can start
respecting the user's $EDITOR.
I had missed in `git2-rs`'s documentation that you need to check
in a callback if the remote ref(s) got updated by the push or
not. This adds such a check and a new error variant for rejected
branch updates.
I tried to push a commit from my Jujube repo to GitHub using `jj
git push --branch main` and it became clear that we need to pass
SSH credentials. This commit hopefully fixes that. I've only made
it pass credentials for ssh-agent for now, because that seems to
be enough to make it work for me personally. If this commit
becomes visible on GitHub, it should mean that it worked.
When you run e.g. `jj st` outside of a repo, it just
crashes. That'll probably give new users a bad impression, so I
was planning to improve error handling a bit. A good place to
start is by fixing the code I recently added (which obviously
should have been using `thiserror` from the beginning). That's
what this commit does.
Also, this is the first commit in this repo created with
Jujube! I've just started dogfooding it myself.
I've forgotten to close a transaction a few times and while the
message ('assertion failed: self.closed') is clear to me now, it
probably won't be clear to others or to me in the future.
With this commit, you can do `jj git clone
https://github.com/martinvonz/jj jj` and such, which seems like a good
step towards making it easier to get started.
This adds `jj git fetch` for fetching from a git remote. There remote
has to be added in the underlying git repo if it doesn't already
exist. I think command will still be useful on typical small projects
with just a single remote on GitHub. With this and the `jj git push` I
added recently, I think I have enough for my most of my own
interaction with GitHub.
I didn't know about the Clap setting to print help if no subcommand
was given, so I had reimplemented that myself for the top-level
command. However, if the user did e.g. `jj git`, they'd get a
crash. This commit fixes that by turning on the setting.
