When we export branches to Git, we didn't update our own record of
Git's refs. This frequently led to spurious conflicts in these refs
(e.g. #463). This is typically what happened:
1. Import a branch pointing to commit A from Git
2. Modify the branch in jj to point to commit B
3. Export the branch to Git
4. Update the branch in Git to point to commit C
5. Import refs from Git
In step 3, we forgot to update our record of the branch in the repo
view's `git_refs` field. That led to the import in step 5 to think
that the branch moved from A to C in Git, which conflicts with the
internal branch target of B.
This commit fixes the bug by updating the refs in the `MutableRepo`.
Closes#463.
As mentioned in the previous commit, we need to remove the Protobuf
dependency in order to be allowed to import jj into Google's
repo. This commit makes `SimpleOpStore` store its data using Thrift
instead of Protobufs. It also adds automatic upgrade of existing
repos. The upgrade process took 18 s in my repo, which has 22k
operations. The upgraded storage uses practically the same amount of
space. `jj op log` (the full outut) in my repo slowed down from 1.2 s
to 3.4 s. Luckily that's an uncommon operation. I couldn't measure any
difference in `jj status` (loading a single operation).
It's useful to know when you've modified a branch that exists on a
remote. A typical case is when you have pushed a branch to a remote
and then rewritten it. This commit adds an indication in the
`branches` template keyword. A branch that needs to be pushed to a
remote now has a `*` at the end (similar to how conflicted branches
have a `?` at the end). Note that the indication only considers
remotes where the branch currently exists, so there won't be an
indication that the branch has not been pushed to a remote.
Closes#254
Unfortunately, TOML requires quotes around the argument. So, the
usage is `jj --config-toml ui.color=\"always\"` in bash. The plan is
to eventually have a `--config` option with simpler syntax for
simple cases.
As discussed in https://github.com/martinvonz/jj/discussions/688.
It seems very likely that we're going to remove support for open
commits, but it's still useful to have a `commit` command that lets
the user enter a description and starts a new change. Calling it
`commit` seems good to make the transition from other VCSs simpler.
If you remove all refs from the backing Git repo and then run `jj git
import`, we would see that all commits disappeared from the Git repo,
so we would remove them from the jj repo too. However, we do that by
doing a history walk from old heads to the new heads, which includes
the root commit when the new heads is an empty set. That means that we
mark the root commit as abandoned, which led to a crash in
`rewrite.rs` (when we try pick the root commit's first parent to use
as parent for rebased commits).
I was trying to create a reproduction script for #412, but the script
ran into another bug first. The script removed all the local and
remote branches from the backing Git repo. I noticed that we would
then try to abandon all commits. We should still count Git HEAD's
target as visible and not try to abandon it. This patch fixes that.
Since 'merges()' just filters the candidates set per item, it doesn't need
a candidates argument. Perhaps, 'merges(x)' could be a predicate to select
merge commits within a subgraph 'x', but I don't know if that would be
useful.
In the current implementation, tree is diffed twice if both PATH and -p
are specified. If this adds significant cost, we'll need to reimplement
it without using a revset abstraction (or maybe adjust revset/graph API.)
Add the `jj interdiff` command for comparing only the diffs of commits.
Its args are identical to that of `jj diff`, minus `--revision` (because
interdiff always requires two commits).
Like `jj obslog -p`, Changes introduced by intervening commits are
ignored by rebasing `--from` onto `--to` 's parents.
`jj merge` just creates an empty change, which is practically the same
as `jj new`. The main difference is that the former requires more than
one argument and the latter requires at most one argument. It seems
cleaner to generalize them and make them aliases. This patch starts
doing that by making `jj new` accept more than one argument.
Instead of having `jj merge` be exactly an alias for `jj new`, we may
want to make it a thin wrapper that just checks that more than one
argument was given. That would probably be less confusing to users who
run `jj merge` without arguments to see what it does.
We should probably make `jj checkout` also be an alias for `jj new`,
but that will have to wait until we have removed support for open
commits (since `jj checkout` still has logic for dealing with open
commits).
I suppose it could be seen as a bug fix that we no longer discard a
description without asking, but it was intentionally done the way it
was before.
While at it, I also clarified that the source commit gets abandoned if
it becomes empty.
In 8ae9540f2c, I made `jj move/squash/unsquash` not abandon the
working copy if it became empty because that would lose any
description associated with it. It turned out that the new behavior
was also confusing because it made it unclear if the working-copy
commit was actually abandoned. Let's roll back that change and instead
ask the user for a combined description when both the source and
destination commits have non-empty descriptions. Not discarding a
non-empty description seems like a good improvement regardless of the
behavior related to working-copy commits. It's also how `hg fold`
behaves (though hg doesn't allow the description to be empty).
I was using a custom `jj log` command and had some trouble finding
the commit `jj merge` created. The default `jj log` command shows it
by default, but my custom one didn't.
The two commands are very similar and we should probably make one an
alias of the other (or just delete one), but for now let's at least
make them more similar by supporting `-m` for both.
I currently think `jj new` is more natural when starting a new change
on top of the current one and `jj checkout` is more natural when
starting a new change on top of another one, as well as when you just
want to look around or run tests. `jj checkout` doesn't currently
default to the working copy like `jj new` does. Perhaps we should make
it do that. Will people eventually feel that it's natural to run `jj
checkout` to create a new change on top of the working copy, or will
they feel that it's natural to run `jj new` on an unrelated commit
even to just look around, or will we want them as synonyms forever?
I was initially worried about the cost of always snapshotting the
working copy, so that's why e.g. `jj diff -r <some hash>` doesn't do
it. However, there's been a few caused by missing snapshotting, and
there are still a few (I just noticed it in `jj undo` while writing
this patch). Let's always do the snapshotting and if the user really
doesn't want it, they can pass `--no-commit-working-copy` (which we
should probably rename to `--no-snapshot-working-copy` or maybe just
`--no-snapshot`). That should reduce bugs and make the CLI more
predictable.
Two test cases were affected becasue `jj merge` also didn't snapshot
the working copy.
Before this patch, e.g. `jj co --no-commit-working-copy` would error
out, but now it will succeed (without touching the working copy,
leaving the working copy stale). That may be confusing, but it should
be easy to recover from (e.g. by `jj undo`). We can consider adding a
check for it later if it seems too confusing (it's probably rarely
something the user wanted).
Since we now allow pushing open commits, we can implement support for
pushing the "current" branch by defining a "current" branch as any
branch pointing to `@`. That definition of a current/active seems to
have been the consensus in discussion #411.
Closes#246.
When rebasing commits after rewrites, we also update all workspaces'
checkouts. If the new commit is closed, we create a new commit on
top. Since we're hoping to remove the open/closed concept, we need a
new condition. I considered creating a new commit on top if the change
ID was different from before the rewrite. However, that would make at
least `jj split` more complicated because it makes the first commit
keep the change ID but it wants the second commit to be checked
out. This patch instead creates the new commit on top only when the
original commit was abandoned.
This patch adds `jj obslog -p` for including the diff compared to the
predecessor (the first predecessor if there are several). If the
predecessor's parents are different, then we create a temporary tree
by rebasing the predecessor to have the same parents and we use the
result as base for the diff. That way, we avoid polluting the diff
with the changes caused by the rebase. (I don't think we currently
have any commands that can change both parents and content, so the
diff should always be empty for rewrites caused by a rebase.)
Working on this also reminded me that it'll be really nice when we
replace `jj obslog` by something based on the operation log - I really
miss seeing information about the operation in the output (like `hg
obslog` gets from its obsmarkers).
I often redirect the jj output to pager, so I set ui.color = "always" in
config file. This patch allows me to remove such config, and instead specify
--color=always only when needed.
According to the NO_COLOR FAQ, "user-level configuration files [...] should
override $NO_COLOR." https://no-color.org/
Unfortunately this makes it harder to test the $NO_COLOR behavior since the
test environment isn't attached to a tty. We could allocate a pty or
LD_PRELOAD shim to intercept isatty(), but I feel it would be too much to do.
https://github.com/assert-rs/assert_cmd/issues/138
This patch prevents perhaps pushing commits with an empty description
or the placeholder "(no user/email configured)" values for
author/committer.
Closes#322.
If a commit's author field has the placeholder user/email values
(i.e. "(no name configured)" and "(no email configured)"), and they
have now configured their email and username, they probably want us to
update the author field with the new information, so that's what this
patch does. Thanks to durin42@ for the suggestion on #322.
If the source commit becomes empty as a result of
`move/squash/unsquash`, we abandon it. However, perhaps we shouldn't
do that if the source commit is a working-copy commit because
working-copy commits are often work-in-progress commits.
The background for this change is that @arxanas had just started a new
change and had set a description on it, and then decided to make some
changes in the working copy that should be in the parent
commit. Running `jj squash` then abandoned the working-copy commit,
resuling in the description getting lost.
Before this change, `jj new` would check out the new commit only if it
was created on top of the current commit. I never liked that
special-casing, and after thinking more about how the open/closed
should work (see discussion #321), I think we want `jj new` to behave
similar to how `git/hg checkout` works, so it can effectively replace
the current `jj checkout` command for the use case of starting new
work on top of an existing commit.
This adds a `--reversed` flag to `jj log` to show commits with later
commits further down. It works both with and without the graph.
Since the graph-drawing code is already independent of the
relationship between commits, it doesn't need any updating.
The default log output of showing all commits is not very useful when
contributing to an existing repo. Let's have it default to showing
commits not on any remote branch instead. I think that's the best we
can do since we don't have a configurable main branch yet, and we
don't even have per-repo configuration..
Closes#250.
