Many callers of resolve_revset() and evaluate_revset() will be migrated to
this wrapper. "single" and "default_single" APIs won't be replaced because
they require more contexts to construct error messages.
id_prefix_context() now uses bare revset::parse() to avoid dependency cycle.
Templater doesn't have the one yet, but I think it belongs to the same
category.
For clap::Error, we could use clap's own mechanism to render suggestions as
"tip: ...", but I feel "Hint: ..." looks better because our error/hint message
is capitalized.
I'm going to add RevsetParseError constructor for InvalidFunctionArguments,
with/without a source error, and I don't want to duplicate code for all
combinations. The templater change is just for consistency.
I couldn't find a good naming convention for the builder-like API, so it's
called .with_source(mut self, _). Another option was .source_set(source).
Apparently, it's not uncommon to name consuming constructor as
with_<something>().
If "all:" is specified, an empty set should be allowed within that expression.
So the additional check we need here is to ensure that the resulting set is not
empty.
One less CLI revset helper. It might look odd that "jj rebase" says "Merge
failed" whereas "jj new" doesn't, but that depends on where the BackendError
is detected.
This commit moves the parse_string_pattern helper function into the
str_util module in jj lib and adds tests for it.
I'd like to reuse this code in a function defined by `UserSettings`, which is
part of the jj lib crate and cannot use functions from the cli crate.
The idea is that, if .extract() succeeded in static context, it means the
property can be evaluated as constant. This will potentially eliminate
expect_string_literal_with(), though I'm not too sure if it's a good idea.
If needed, maybe we can extend the idea to suppress type/name resolution errors
by "if(some_static_config_knob, x, y)".
This allows us to propagate property evaluation error to a string property. For
instance, "s.contains(x ++ y)" will be an error if "y" failed to evaluate,
whereas bare "x ++ y" shouldn't.
The other implementation ideas:
a. add Template::into_string_property() to enable strict evaluation
=> it's tedious to implement it for each printable type
b. pass (formatter, error_handler) arguments separately
=> works, but most implementors don't need error_handler argument
c. pass strict=bool flag around build_*() functions
=> didn't tried, but it would be more complicated than this patch
Because Template trait is now implementation detail of the templater, it
should be okay to use a non-standard formatter wrapper.
Commands like `new`, `duplicate`, and `abandon` can take multiple revset
arguments which results in their collective union. They take the revisions
directly as arguments. But for consistency with many other commands, they can
also take the `-r` argument, which is a no-op. However, due to the flag being
specified as a `bool`, the `-r` option can only be specified once, so e.g.
`abandon -r x -r y` often fails. I normally use `-r` for consistency and muscle
memory, so this bites me often.
Instead, use `clap::ArgAction::Count` in order to allow `-r` to be specified
multiple times. It remains unused, of course.
With this change, all the following invocations are equivalent. Before this
change, the second example would fail due to giving `-r` multiple times.
jj abandon x y
jj abandon -r x -r y
jj abandon -r 'x | y'
Note: `jj new` already supported this exact case actually, but it used an
awkward trick where it used `.overrides_with()` in order to override *itself* so
it could be specified multiple times. I believe this is a bit clearer.
Signed-off-by: Austin Seipp <aseipp@pobox.com>
Change-Id: Ib36cf81d46dae4f698f06d0a32e8fd3120bfb4a4
This makes the summary line more informative. Even though it just duplicates
the message printed later, I think it's easier to follow.
This patch also adjusts some RevsetParseError messages because it seemed
redundant to repeat "revset function", "argument", etc.
Because the CLI error handler now prints error sources in multi-line format,
it doesn't make much sense to render Revset/TemplateParseError differently.
This patch also fixes the source() of the SyntaxError kind. It should be
self.pest_error.source() (= None), not self.pest_error.
I'm going to make TemplateParseError hold RevsetParseError as Box<dyn _>, but
Box<dyn std::error::Error ..> doesn't implement Eq. I could remove Eq from
ErrorKind enums, but it's handly if these enums remain as value types.
This change will also simplify fmt::Display and error::Error impls.
This can be used to flatten nested "if()"s. It's not exactly the same as "case"
or "switch" expression, but works reasonably well in template. It's not uncommon
to show placeholder text in place of an empty content, and a nullish value
(e.g. empty string, list, option) is usually rendered as an empty text.
A formatted error is not a string containing ANSI escape sequences because 1.
the output may be differently colored inside "hint", 2. the caller might not
be accessible to ui.new_formatter().
Highlighting "{n}: " will help to follow error sources containing multi-line
messages. I'm going to make revset/template alias errors be formatted as plain
error chain.
It's inconsistent that some warnings have headings and some don't, and it seems
the choice is arbitrary. Let's unify the style. There are two exceptions:
1. continued line following labeled message,
2. "unrecognized response" followed by prompt.
The lowercase "warning: " is unified to "Warning: " as it is the jj's
convention afaik.
The _default() suffix could be dropped from these methods, but it's probably
better to break the existing codebase for the moment. Otherwise, the caller
might do writeln!(ui.warning(), "Warning: ..").
The existing .hint() method is renamed to .hint_no_heading() to clarify that
it's not the default choice to print a hint. I'll add .hint_default() later,
which will be the shorthand for .hint_with_heading("Hint: ").
This will be used to label "Error: " heading and content differently. I want
to see an error message in the default (white) color because it's easier to
read, but I still want to highlight the "Error: " heading.
We can achieve that without introducing new wrapper, but the resulting code
would look something like "writeln!(ui.error("Error: ")?, ..)?", and it would
get messier if the caller had to suppress io::Error.
I don't think we have any callers left that call
`record_rewritten_commit()` multiple times within a transaction and
expect it to result in divergence. I think we should consider it a bug
to do that.
