Thanks to @glencbz for noticing that VS Code works fine now as a
merge tool, and thanks to @solson for suggesting
`merge-tool-edits-conflict-markers = true`.
I have used the tree-level conflict format for several weeks without
problem (after the fix in 51b5d168ae). Now - right after the 0.10.0
release - seems like a good time to enable the config by default.
I enabled the config in our default configs in the CLI crate to reduce
impact on tests (compared to changing the default in `settings.rs`).
This adds a new `revset-aliases.immutable_heads()s` config for
defining the set of immutable commits. The set is defined as the
configured revset, as well as its ancestors, and the root commit
commit (even if the configured set is empty).
This patch also adds enforcement of the config where we already had
checks preventing rewrite of the root commit. The working-copy commit
is implicitly assumed to be writable in most cases. Specifically, we
won't prevent amending the working copy even if the user includes it
in the config but we do prevent `jj edit @` in that case. That seems
good enough to me. Maybe we should emit a warning when the working
copy is in the set of immutable commits.
Maybe we should add support for something more like [Mercurial's
phases](https://wiki.mercurial-scm.org/Phases), which is propagated on
push and pull. There's already some affordance for that in the view
object's `public_heads` field. However, this is simpler, especially
since we can't propagate the phase to Git remotes, and seems like a
good start. Also, it lets you say that commits authored by other users
are immutable, for example.
For now, the functionality is in the CLI library. I'm not sure if we
want to move it into the library crate. I'm leaning towards letting
library users do whatever they want without being restricted by
immutable commits. I do think we should move the functionality into a
future `ui-lib` or `ui-util` crate. That crate would have most of the
functionality in the current `cli_util` module (but in a
non-CLI-specific form).
With the idea that less severe placeholders (like description) could
(and should) explicitly "opt out".
(Both email and name placeholders will be red with this change.)
This patch also extracts format_detailed_signature() function to deduplicate
the "show" template bits.
The added placeholder templates aren't labeled as "empty". If needed, I think
the whole template can be labeled as "empty" (or "empty_commit") just like
"working_copy".
Closes#2112
Bright green really pops on my screen, and I don't think there is a reason
for the root commit to be attention-grabbing.
This follows up on https://github.com/martinvonz/jj/pull/2084.
I've extracted the `builtin_log_root` template for users to customize the
default templates without fully overriding them, for example I would remove
the change_id/commit_id for myself - and we discussed in Discord that leaving
those makes sense for the user to be reminded/teached that the root commit has
a change id made from z's.
Empty files can be confusing in diff output. For example:
```
Added regular file file1:
Added regular file file2:
1: foo
```
This commit adds an "(empty)" placeholder instead. Since it's not
colored, and doesn't have line numbers, it will hopefully not be
mistaken for a file with the contents "(empty)".
They are shown next to the change and commit id, since they are other names the
commit can be referred by.
The description is separated from the branches by a ` | ` when there are
branches, so that one can tell the branches from the description without color.
The result looks like this: 
Summary: In preparation for unifying all workspace dependencies across all
crates, let's go ahead and move the jj-cli crate into its own new directory.
This will also be a nicer and more uniform layout as we add new `jj-*` crates.
Signed-off-by: Austin Seipp <aseipp@pobox.com>
Change-Id: Icf94e7ae5f290dc8e181215727b38ada
