I'm going to add a Merge method that removes negative/positive terms pair, and
swap_remove() is the easiest option. The order of the conflicted ref targets
doesn't matter.
This partially reverts the change in 30fb7995c2 "view: make local/remote
branches iterator yield RemoteRef instead of RefTarget." As I'm going to add
diff function for RemoteRef pairs, we'll need a generic version of merge-join
iterator anyway.
We can provide more actionable error message than "not fast-forwardable". If
the push was fast-forwardable, "jj branch track" should be able to merge the
remote branch without conflicts, so the added step would be minimal.
Although this is logically correct, the error message is a bit cryptic. It's
probably better to reject push if non-tracking remote branches exist.
#1136
We'll use remote_ref.tracking_target() to classify push action, but not all
callers of local_remote_branches() need tracking_target() instead of target.
There's a subtle behavior change. Unlike the original remove_remote_branch(),
remote_views entry is not discarded when the branches map becomes empty. The
reasoning here is that the remote view can be added/removed when the remote
is added/removed respectively, though that's not implemented yet. Since the
serialized data cannot represent an empty remote, such view may generate
non-unique content hash.
As I'm going to split branches into per-remote map, .get_branch(name) will need
to gather remote branches by name to construct remote_targets map. Let's instead
iterate local/remote branches separately. I also migrated diffing of the other
kinds of refs to filter out unchanged entries upfront.
Since `Conflict<T>` can also represent a non-conflict state (a single
term), `Merge<T>` seems like better name.
Thanks to @ilyagr for the suggestion in
https://github.com/martinvonz/jj/pull/1774#discussion_r1257547709
Sorry about the churn. It would have been better if I thought of this
name before I introduced `Conflict<T>`.
This is breaking change. Old jj binary will panic if it sees a view saved by
new jj. Alternatively, we can store both new and legacy data for backward
compatibility.
Copied from MergedTree::has_conflict(). I feel it's slightly better since
RefTarget "is" always a Conflict-based type. It could be inverted to
RefTarget::is_resolved(), but refs are usually resolved, and all callers
have special case for !is_resolved() state.
Alternatively, we can wrap BTreeMap<String, Option<RefTarget>> to flatten
Option<&Option<..>> internally, but doing that would be tedious. It would
also be unclear if map.remove(name) should construct an absent RefTarget if
the ref doesn't exist.
The next commit will change these maps to store Option<RefTarget> entries, but
None entries will still be omitted from the serialized data. Since ContentHash
should describe the serialized data, relying on the generic ContentHash would
cause future hash conflict where absent RefTarget entries will be preserved.
For example, ([remove], [None, add]) will be serialized as ([remove], [add]),
and deserialized to ([remove], [add, None]). If we add support for lossless
serialization, hash(([remove], [None, add])) should differ from the lossy one.
Since RefTarget will be reimplemented on top of Conflict<Option<CommitId>>,
we won't be able to simply return a slice of type &[CommitId]. These functions
are also renamed in order to disambiguate from Conflict::adds()/removes().
RefTarget type will be a wrapper around Conflict<Option<CommitId>>, and the
match arms would be more verbose. Fortunately, new code looks simpler since
we can merge non-conflicting cases.
It's named after Conflict::from_legacy_form(). If RefTarget is migrated to
new Conflict type, from_legacy_form([], [add]) will create a normal target,
and from_legacy_form([], []) will be equivalent to the current None target.
That's why this function isn't named as RefTarget::conflict().
If RefTarget is migrated to new Conflict type, this function will create
RefTarget(Conflict::resolved(Some(id))).
We still need some .unwrap() to insert Option<RefTarget> into map, but maps
will be changed to store new RefTarget type, and their mutation API will
guarantee that Conflict::resolved(None) is eliminated.
This might look more complicated than the original code, but it clarifies
that we always eliminate a (remove, add) pair. The behavior slightly changed
since an absent ref (i.e. None) in "removes" can now be paired with an "add"
even if "removes" contained other ids. Before, it was possible only when
removes.is_empty().
The order of conflicted ids slightly changed since Conflict::simplify()
tries to preserve diff pairs. It shouldn't matter so long as the result is
stable.
Let's acknowledge everyone's contributions by replacing "Google LLC"
in the copyright header by "The Jujutsu Authors". If I understand
correctly, it won't have any legal effect, but maybe it still helps
reduce concerns from contributors (though I haven't heard any
concerns).
Google employees can read about Google's policy at
go/releasing/contributions#copyright.
It's annoying to have to add `--branch main` every time I push to
GitHub.
Maybe we should make it push only the current branch by default, but
we don't even have a concept of a current branch yet...
When there are two concurrent operations, we would resolve conflicting
updates of git refs quite arbitrarily before this change. This change
introduces a new `refs` module with a function for doing a 3-way merge
of ref targets. For example, if both sides moved a ref forward but by
different amounts, we pick the descendant-most target. If we can't
resolve it, we leave it as a conflict. That's fine to do for git refs
because they can be resolved by simply running `jj git refresh` to
import refs again (the underlying git repo is the source of truth).
As with the previous change, I'm doing this now because mostly because
it is a good stepping stone towards branch support (issue #21). We'll
soon use the same 3-way merging for updating the local branch
definition (once we add that) when a branch changes in the git repo or
on a remote.
