# Frequently asked questions ### Why does my branch not move to the new commit after `jj new/commit`? If you're familiar with Git, you might expect the current branch to move forward when you commit. However, Jujutsu does not have a concept of a "current branch". To move branches, use `jj branch set`. ### I made a commit and `jj git push --all` says "Nothing changed" instead of pushing it. What do I do? `jj git push --all` pushes all _branches_, not all revisions. You have two options: * Using `jj git push --change` will automatically create a branch and push it. * Using `jj branch` commands to create or move a branch to either the commit you want to push or a descendant on it. Unlike Git, Jujutsu doesn't do this automatically (see previous question). ### Where is my commit, why is it not visible in `jj log`? Is your commit visible with `jj log -r 'all()'`? If yes, you should be aware that `jj log` only shows the revisions matching `revsets.log` by default. You can change it as described in [config] to show more revisions. If not, the revision may have been abandoned (e.g. because you used `jj abandon`, or because it's an obsolete version that's been rewritten with `jj rebase`, `jj describe`, etc). In that case, `jj log -r commit_id` should show the revision as "hidden". `jj new commit_id` should make the revision visible again. See [revsets] and [templates] for further guidance. ### How can I get `jj log` to show me what `git log` would show me? Use `jj log -r ..`. The `..` [operator] lists all visible commits in the repo, excluding the root (which is never interesting and is shared by all repos). ### `jj` is said to record the working copy after `jj log` and every other command. Where can I see these automatic "saves"? Indeed, every `jj` command updates the current "working-copy" revision, marked with `@` in `jj log`. You can notice this by how the [commit ID] of the working copy revision changes when it's updated. Note that, unless you move to another revision (with `jj new` or `jj edit`, for example), the [change ID] will not change. If you expected to see a historical view of your working copy changes in the parent-child relationships between commits you can see in `jj log`, this is simply not what they mean. What you can see in `jj log` is that after the working copy commit gets amended (after any edit), the commit ID changes. You can see the actual history of working copy changes using `jj obslog`. This will show the history of the commits that were previously the "working-copy commit", since the last time the change id of the working copy commit changed. The obsolete changes will be marked as "hidden". They are still accessible with any `jj` command (`jj diff`, for example), but you will need to use the commit id to refer to hidden commits. You can also use `jj obslog -r` on revisions that were previously the working-copy revisions (or on any other revisions). Use `jj obslog -p` as an easy way to see the evolution of the commit's contents. ### Can I prevent Jujutsu from recording my unfinished work? I'm not ready to commit it. Jujutsu automatically records new files in the current working-copy commit and doesn't provide a way to prevent that. However, you can easily record intermediate drafts of your work. If you think you might want to go back to the current state of the working-copy commit, simply use `jj new`. There's no need for the commit to be "finished" or even have a description. Then future edits will go into a new working-copy commit on top of the now former working-copy commit. Whenever you are happy with another set of edits, use `jj squash` to amend the previous commit. If you have changes you _never_ want to put in a public commit, see: [How can I keep my scratch files in the repository without committing them?](#how-can-i-keep-my-scratch-files-in-the-repository-without-committing-them) For more options see the next question. ### Can I interactively create a new commit from only some of the changes in the working copy, like `git add -p && git commit` or `hg commit -i`? Since the changes are already in the working-copy commit, the equivalent to `git add -p && git commit`/`git commit -p`/`hg commit -i` is to split the working-copy commit with `jj split -i` (or the practically identical `jj commit -i`). For the equivalent of `git commit --amend -p`/`hg amend -i`, use `jj squash -i`. ### Is there something like `git rebase --interactive` or `hg histedit`? Not yet, you can check [this issue] for updates. To reorder commits, it is for now recommended to rebase commits individually, which may require multiple invocations of `jj rebase -r` or `jj rebase -s`. To squash or split commits, use `jj squash` and `jj split`. ### How can I keep my scratch files in the repository without committing them? You can keep your notes and other scratch files in the repository, if you add a wildcard pattern to either the repo's `gitignore` or your global `gitignore`. Something like `*.scratch` or `*.scratchpad` should do, after that rename the files you want to keep around to match the pattern. If you keep your scratch files in their own directory with no tracked files, you can create a `.gitignore` file in that directory containing only `*`. This will ignore everything in the directory including the `.gitignore` file itself. If `$EDITOR` integration is important, something like `scratchpad.*` may be more helpful, as you can keep the filename extension intact (it matches `scratchpad.md`, `scratchpad.rs` and more). Another option is to add a directory to the global `.gitignore` which then stores all your temporary files and notes. For example, you could add `scratch/` to `~/.git/ignore` and then store arbitrary files in `/scratch/`. You can find more details on `gitignore` files [here][gitignore]. ### How can I avoid committing my local-only changes to tracked files? Suppose your repository tracks a file like `secret_config.json`, and you make some changes to that file to work locally. Since Jujutsu automatically commits the working copy, there's no way to prevent Jujutsu from committing changes to the file. But, you never want to push those changes to the remote repository. One solution is to keep these changes in a separate commit branched from the trunk. To use those changes in your working copy, _merge_ the private commit into your branch. Suppose you have a commit "Add new feature": ```shell $ jj log @ xxxxxxxx me@example.com 2024-08-21 11:13:21 ef612875 │ Add new feature ◉ yyyyyyyy me@example.com 2024-08-21 11:13:09 main b624cf12 │ Existing work ~ ``` First, create a new commit branched from main and add your private changes: ```shell $ jj new main -m "private: my credentials" Working copy now at: wwwwwwww 861de9eb (empty) private: my credentials Parent commit : yyyyyyyy b624cf12 main | Existing work Added 0 files, modified 1 files, removed 0 files $ echo '{ "password": "p@ssw0rd1" }' > secret_config.json ``` Now create a merge commit with the branch you're working on and the private commit: ```shell $ jj new xxxxxxxx wwwwwwww Working copy now at: vvvvvvvv ac4d9fbe (empty) (no description set) Parent commit : xxxxxxxx ef612875 Add new feature Parent commit : wwwwwwww 2106921e private: my credentials Added 0 files, modified 1 files, removed 0 files $ jj log @ vvvvvvvv me@example.com 2024-08-22 08:57:40 ac4d9fbe ├─╮ (empty) (no description set) │ ◉ wwwwwwww me@example.com 2024-08-22 08:57:40 2106921e │ │ private: my credentials ◉ │ xxxxxxxx me@example.com 2024-08-21 11:13:21 ef612875 ├─╯ Add new feature ◉ yyyyyyyy me@example.com 2024-08-21 11:13:09 main b624cf12 │ Existing work ~ ``` Now you're ready to work: - Your work in progress _xxxxxxxx_ is the first parent of the merge commit. - The private commit _wwwwwwww_ is the second parent of the merge commit. - The working copy (_vvvvvvvv_) contains changes from both. As you work, squash your changes using `jj squash --into xxxxxxxx`. Or, you can keep your changes in a separate commit and remove _ttsqqnrx_ as a parent: ```shell # Remove the private commit as a parent $ jj rebase -r vvvvvvvv -d xxxxxxxx # Create a new merge commit to work in $ jj new vvvvvvvv wwwwwwww ``` To avoid pushing change _wwwwwwww_ by mistake, use the configuration [git.private-commits](config.md#set-of-private-commits): ``` $ jj config set --user git.private-commits 'description(glob:"private:*")' ``` ### I accidentally changed files in the wrong commit, how do I move the recent changes into another commit? Use `jj obslog -p` to see how your working-copy commit has evolved. Find the commit you want to restore the contents to. Let's say the current commit (with the changes intended for a new commit) are in commit X and the state you wanted is in commit Y. Note the commit id (normally in blue at the end of the line in the log output) of each of them. Now use `jj new` to create a new working-copy commit, then run `jj restore --from Y --to @-` to restore the parent commit to the old state, and `jj restore --from X` to restore the new working-copy commit to the new state. ### How do I resume working on an existing change? There are two ways to resume working on an earlier change: `jj new` then `jj squash`, and `jj edit`. The first is generally recommended, but `jj edit` can be useful. When you use `jj edit`, the revision is directly amended with your new changes, making it difficult to tell what exactly you change. You should avoid using `jj edit` when the revision has a conflict, as you may accidentally break the plain-text annotations on your state without realising. To start, use `jj new ` to create a change based on that earlier revision. Make your edits, then use `jj squash` to update the earlier revision with those edits. For when you would use git stashing, use `jj edit ` for expected behaviour. Other workflows may prefer `jj edit` as well. ### How do I deal with divergent changes ('??' after the [change ID])? A [divergent change][glossary_divergent_change] represents a change that has two or more visible commits associated with it. To refer to such commits, you must use their [commit ID]. Most commonly, the way to resolve this is to abandon the unneeded commits (using `jj abandon `). If you would like to keep both commits with this change ID, you can `jj duplicate` one of them before abandoning it. ### How do I deal with conflicted branches ('??' after branch name)? A [conflicted branch][branches_conflicts] is a branch that refers to multiple different commits because jj couldn't fully resolve its desired position. Resolving conflicted branches is usually done by setting the branch to the correct commit using `jj branch set `. Usually, the different commits associated with the conflicted branch should all appear in the log, but if they don't you can use `jj branch list`to show all the commits associated with it. ### How do I integrate Jujutsu with Gerrit? At the moment you'll need a script, which adds the required fields for Gerrit like the `Change-Id` footer. Then `jj` can invoke it via an `$EDITOR` override in an aliased command. Here's an [example][gerrit-integration] from an contributor (look for the `jj signoff` alias). After you have attached the `Change-Id:` footer to the commit series, you'll have to manually invoke `git push` of `HEAD` on the underlying git repository into the remote Gerrit branch `refs/for/$BRANCH`, where `$BRANCH` is the base branch you want your changes to go to (e.g., `git push origin HEAD:refs/for/main`). Using a [co-located][co-located] repo will make the underlying git repo directly accessible from the working directory. We hope to integrate with Gerrit natively in the future. [branches_conflicts]: branches.md#conflicts [change ID]: glossary.md#change-id [co-located]: glossary.md#co-located-repos [commit ID]: glossary.md#commit-id [config]: config.md [gerrit-integration]: https://gist.github.com/thoughtpolice/8f2fd36ae17cd11b8e7bd93a70e31ad6 [gitignore]: https://git-scm.com/docs/gitignore [glossary_divergent_change]: glossary.md#divergent-change [operator]: revsets.md#operators [revsets]: revsets.md [templates]: templates.md [this issue]: https://github.com/martinvonz/jj/issues/1531