-*-Indented-Text-*- GNU Make TODO List ------------------ This list comes both from the authors and from users of GNU make. They are listed in no particular order! Also, I don't guarantee that all of them will be ultimately deemed "good ideas" and implemented. These are just the ones that, at first blush, seem to have some merit (and that I can remember). However, if you see something here you really, really want, speak up. All other things being equal, I will tend to implement things that seem to maximize user satisfaction. If you want to implement some of them yourself, barring the ones I've marked below, have at it! Please contact me first to let me know you're working on it, and give me some info about the design--and, critically, information about any user-visible syntax change, etc. The Top Item ------------ If you know perl (or want to learn DejaGNU or similar), the number one priority on my list of things I don't have time to do right now is fixing up the GNU make test suite. Most importantly it needs to be made "parallelizable", so more than one regression can run at the same time (essentially, make the "work" directory local). Also, the CWD during the test should be in the work directory or, better, a test-specific temporary directory so each test gets a new directory; right now sometimes tests leak files into the main directory which causes subsequent tests to fail (some tests may need to be tweaked). Beyond that, any cleanup done to make writing, reading, or handling tests simpler would be great! Please feel free to make whatever changes you like to the current tests, given some high-level goals, and that you'll port the current tests to whatever you do :). The Rest of the List -------------------- 1) Option to check more than timestamps to determine if targets have changed. This is also a very big one. It's _close_ to my plate :), and I have very definite ideas about how I would like it done. Please pick something else unless you must have this feature. If you try it, please work _extremely_ closely with me on it. 1a) Possibly a special case of this is the .KEEP_STATE feature of Sun's make. Some great folks at W U. in Canada did an implementation of this for a class project. Their approach is reasonable and workable, but doesn't really fit into my ideas for #2. Maybe that's OK. I have paperwork for their work so if you want to do this one talk to me to get what they've already done. [K R Praveen ] 2) Currently you can use "%.foo %.bar : %.baz" to mean that one invocation of the rule builds both targets. GNU make needs a way to do that for explicit rules, too. I heard a rumor that some versions of make all you to say "a.foo + a.bar : a.baz" to do this (i.e., a "+" means one invocation builds both). Don't know if this is the best syntax or not... what if you say "a.foo + a.bar a.bam : a.baz"; what does that mean? 3) Multi-token pattern rule matching (allow %1/%2.c : %1/obj/%2.o, etc., or something like that). Maybe using regex? 4) Provide a .TARGETS variable, containing the names of the targets defined in the makefile. Actually, I now think a $(targets ...) function, at least, might be better than a MAKETARGETS variable. The argument would be types of targets to list: "phony" is the most useful one. I suppose "default" might also be useful. Maybe some others; check the bitfields to see what might be handy. 5) Some sort of operating-system independent way of handling paths would be outstanding, so makefiles can be written for UNIX, VMS, DOS, MS-Windows, Amiga, etc. with a minimum of specialization. Or, perhaps related/instead of, some sort of meta-quoting syntax so make can deal with filenames containing spaces, colons, etc. I dunno, maybe something like $[...]? This may well not be worth doing until #1 is done. 6) Right now the .PRECIOUS, .INTERMEDIATE, and .SECONDARY pseudo-targets have different capabilities. For example, .PRECIOUS can take a "%", the others can't. Etc. These should all work the same, insofar as that makes sense. 7) Improved debugging/logging/etc. capabilities. Part of this is done: I introduced a number of debugging enhancements. Tim Magill is (I think) looking into options to control output more selectively. One thing I want to do in debugging is add a flag to allow debugging of variables as they're expanded (!). This would be incredibly verbose, but could be invaluable when nothing else seems to work and you just can't figure it out. The way variables are expanded now means this isn't 100% trivial, but it probably won't be hard. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Copyright (C) 1997-2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This file is part of GNU Make. GNU Make is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. GNU Make is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with this program. If not, see .